☰

Dust Review: Custom AI Agents for Enterprise Workflows

1. Introduction – Why Dust Stands Out

Dust stands out in the crowded AI tools market as an enterprise-grade AI agent platform focused on connecting large language models to real company data and tools in a secure, governed way. Rather than being “just another chatbot,” Dust enables organizations to design tailored AI agents that understand internal knowledge, orchestrate workflows, and interact with existing systems like Slack, Notion, GitHub, and Google Drive. For tech professionals, its strengths lie in composability (agents, tools, apps), model-agnostic infrastructure, and a clear focus on data security and access control.

2. What Is Dust? – Background, Purpose, and Technology

Dust is a cloud-based AI platform that lets teams build and deploy custom AI agents wired into their internal knowledge and SaaS stack. The product is built by Dust (dust.tt), an AI company positioning its platform as a way to “transform how work gets done” with secure, data-augmented agents tuned to each organization’s workflows.

The platform is model-agnostic: it supports multiple foundation models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, others) and can route queries across them, allowing experimentation, fallback, and optimization for cost and performance. Technically, Dust offers:

  • A no-code/low-code agent builder for non-engineering teams.
  • A developer-focused platform (Dust Apps, API, MCP integration) for custom actions and infrastructure-level integrations.

Its core purpose is to break down knowledge silos and reduce context-switching by having agents answer questions, automate tasks, and orchestrate workflows across the tools teams already use.

3. Key Features – Main Functions

3.1 Custom AI Agents and Team Orchestration

Dust lets organizations create specialized agents for engineering, productivity, legal, HR, and more, each configured with its own capabilities and context. Teams can orchestrate “teams of agents” that collaborate with humans—for example, one agent summarizing incidents, another drafting communication, and another updating documentation.

3.2 Data-Connected, Context-Aware Infrastructure

Agents can be connected to company data from Slack, Google Drive, Notion, Confluence, GitHub, and other sources. Dust uses a “context-aware infrastructure” where agents access relevant documents via semantic search and retrieval instead of static knowledge bases. Fine-grained access control via Spaces ensures agents only see data a user is allowed to see, which is critical for enterprise use.

3.3 Multi-Tool Workflows: Beyond Search and Chat

Dust agents can call multiple tools—semantic search, data analysis, web navigation, custom actions—within a single workspace, going beyond simple Q&A. With Dust Apps, teams can chain model calls, APIs, and data sources to build multi-step workflows (e.g., pull tickets from Jira, summarize them, then push updates to Slack).

3.4 Developer Platform: MCP, Apps, and API

For engineering and platform teams, Dust offers:

  • MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration to plug in custom tools via MCP servers.
  • Dust Apps to orchestrate workflows that call models, APIs, and code.
  • Dust API to manage agents, data sources, and interactions programmatically and embed Dust in other products.

This makes Dust attractive both as an end-user product and as a backend for custom LLM applications.

3.5 Enterprise Security, Governance, and Compliance

Dust emphasizes enterprise readiness: SOC 2 compliance, optional zero data retention, SSO/SCIM at Enterprise tier, region-specific hosting (US/EU), and fine-grained permissions. This aligns with requirements of larger organizations wary of sending sensitive data to generic AI tools.

4. User Experience – Ease of Use, UI, Integrations

Dust’s UX revolves around a unified workspace where teams access agents, configure data sources, and collaborate. The interface exposes:

  • Agent configuration panels (capabilities, tools, knowledge sources).
  • Visual workflows for building and testing agent behaviors.
  • Conversation interfaces in web and embedded contexts (e.g., Slack).

Reviews characterize Dust as easier to adopt than building in-house agent frameworks, especially for non-technical stakeholders who can configure agents via visual interfaces and templates.

Integrations include:

  • Slack, Notion, Confluence, Google Drive, GitHub as first-class data sources.
  • Model providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, etc.
  • Programmatic access via API, MCP, and connectors for embedding Dust into existing apps and workflows.

5. Performance and Results – Examples and Benchmarks

Dust markets outcome-focused use cases across functions:

  • Engineering: Agents auto-review code, aggregate code context and issues, generate and update documentation, and streamline incident runbooks.
  • Productivity: Agents summarize meetings, extract action items, generate structured reports, and automate document creation.
  • Legal & HR: Agents review contracts for issues, answer policy questions, assist onboarding, and support recruitment workflows.

External profiles emphasize gains in productivity, faster access to knowledge, and reduced context-switching, though detailed quantitative benchmarks (e.g., time saved metrics) are typically customer-specific and not broadly published.

Given its model-agnostic design and multi-model support, performance can be tuned by choosing more capable models for complex reasoning and cheaper ones for routine tasks.

6. Pricing and Plans – Free vs Paid

Dust targets professional and enterprise teams with a straightforward paid model:

  • Pro Plan
    • €29/user/month (or ~$29/user/month), billed per seat.
    • 14–15 day free trial but no long-term free tier.
    • Includes collaborative AI agents, standard integrations, and access to the platform’s core features.
  • Enterprise Plan
    • Custom pricing, typically for 100+ users and multiple workspaces.
    • Adds SSO (Okta/Entra/JumpCloud), SCIM, expanded storage/file limits, custom programmatic pricing, priority support, and region-specific hosting.

Third-party comparisons highlight that Dust’s per-seat pricing is predictable but can become costly at scale, especially as usage and advanced features increase. There is no perpetual free tier, which differentiates it from some agent platforms that offer credits-based free plans.

7. Pros and Cons – Balanced Summary

Pros

  • Strong focus on custom, data-connected AI agents tailored to enterprise workflows.
  • Model-agnostic: supports multiple LLM providers and strategies.
  • Deep integrations with core knowledge tools (Slack, Drive, Notion, Confluence, GitHub).
  • Fine-grained access control and enterprise security features (SOC 2, SSO/SCIM, data residency).
  • Developer platform (MCP, Apps, API) enables advanced integrations and LLM app development.

Cons

  • No free-forever tier; only a short trial before committing to paid seats.
  • Per-seat pricing may become expensive for large organizations or casual users.
  • Requires upfront configuration of data sources and access policies to realize full value.
  • Less suited to small individual users compared with lighter-weight chat tools.

8. Best For – Ideal Users and Industries

Dust is particularly well-suited for:

  • Mid-size to large enterprises that want secure, centralized AI agents across departments.
  • Engineering and product teams needing agents for code review, incident management, documentation, and technical knowledge retrieval.
  • Knowledge-heavy functions such as legal, HR, and customer support where agents must reference internal policies, contracts, and historical conversations.
  • Platform and AI teams that want a model-agnostic agent layer with API/MCP integration rather than building their own framework from scratch.

Industries with complex knowledge bases—SaaS, financial services, healthcare, legal, and large B2B enterprises—stand to benefit most from Dust’s focus on secure data access and workflow orchestration.

9. Final Verdict – Overall Rating and Insights

Dust occupies a clear niche as an enterprise AI agent platform built around company data, security, and composable workflows rather than generic chat. For tech professionals evaluating AI agent solutions, Dust’s strengths are its integration depth, governance features, and developer extensibility.

A reasonable composite rating:

  • Overall: 4.4 / 5
    • 4.6 / 5 for enterprise readiness (security, access control, integrations).
    • 4.5 / 5 for flexibility (model-agnostic, developer tools).
    • 4.0 / 5 for pricing accessibility and entry barrier (no free tier, per-seat cost).

Teams that treat AI as strategic infrastructure—not just a productivity add-on—are likely to see strong ROI from Dust, provided they have the scale and governance needs to justify the investment.

10. Conclusion – Key Takeaways and Recommendations

Dust delivers a robust, secure, and extensible platform for building data-augmented AI agents that work across an organization’s existing tools and knowledge. Its agent orchestration, model-agnostic design, and enterprise security posture make it a strong candidate for companies standardizing on AI agents as part of their core workflow stack.

Recommendations for tech professionals:

  • Use the 14–15 day Pro trial to prototype 1–2 high-impact agents (e.g., engineering knowledge assistant, internal support bot) on real data.
  • Involve security and IT early to configure Spaces, access control, and data residency.
  • For organizations with 100+ users or strict compliance needs, evaluate Enterprise for SSO/SCIM and custom hosting.

For enterprises serious about operationalizing AI agents across teams, Dust is a credible, future-proof platform worth close consideration.